What Would Jesus Tax?
How do we live in justice, peace with our neighbors, and widely-shared prosperity?
Home Themes index Documents index Links Contact Us

 

My Neighbor's Landmark:
Short Studies in Bible Land Laws
by Frederick Verinder
Chapter 2: First Principles: "The Earth is The Lord's"
"Thy land which Thou hast given to Thy people for an inheritance."— 1 Kings 8:36.

§ 1. THE general principles upon which the Hebrew Land Laws were based are absolutely fatal to the idea of private property in land. It would be too little to say that land monopoly was treated with great severity by the Law: the Law was expressly designed to make it impossible, for the Lawgiver knew that there can be no social justice in a State while what Herbert Spencer called "the equal right to the use of the earth" is denied to its members.
§ 2. The keynote is struck in the very first sentence of the Pentateuch. "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth,"28 and is frequently repeated elsewhere.29 "The sea is His, and He made it and His hands formed the dry land."30 "The earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof; the world and they that dwell therein. For He hath founded it upon the seas, and established it upon the floods."31 "The world is Mine, and the fulness thereof."32 "Thus saith the Lord, The heaven is My throne, and the earth is My footstool … for all those things hath Mine hand made."33 God Almighty is, therefore, by right of creation, the only landlord. When the late Lord Salisbury attempted, in the House of Lords,34 to justify the preferential claim of the landlord over all the other creditors of the farmer, on the ground that "the landlord furnishes the land" to the farmer, his statement would have been regarded by the Hebrew Lawgiver as blasphemous, and would probably have been characterised by the plain-speaking Amos in language to which most of our newspapers would hesitate to accord the honor of a verbatim report. 28 Genesis 1:1; 24:3; Nehemiah 9:6; Psalm 102:25; 124:8; Isa 42:5; 45: 12; Jer. 10:12; Heb 1:10 
29 It was evidently recognized as a distinctively Hebrew belief (Jonah 1:9).
30  Psalm 95:5
31 Psalm 24:1, 2; cp 1 Co 10:26, 28
32 Psalm 1:12; cp 89: 11, 12; Ex 19:5
33 Isa. 66:1, 2
34 In 1885, Speech on the "British Agricultural Association Bill."  The Bill proposed "to enable a company of capitalists to lend money to the farmer against his crop,"  the crop being ear-marked, as against other creditors, for the repayment of the advance.  "But it is to be noticed," said this sturdy champion of landlordism, "that it is not proposed that he (the capitalist) should stand before the landlord, because that would not be just.  The landlord furnishes the land,  and the capitalist the capital, and it would not be fair that the capitalist should come and thrust the landlord aside, and stand before him.  The landlord's interest is saved.  He has an absolute veto on any proceedings under this bill."
§ 3. For, while the class which the late Lord Salisbury so worthily represented seems to say, "The earth is the (land)lord's, and land doth he 'furnish' to the farmer," the Biblical reading is quite otherwise. "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." Therefore "unto the Lord thy God belongeth the heaven, and the heaven of heavens, the earth, with all that therein is."35 "The heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's; but the earth hath He given to the children of men."36
35 Deut 10:14 R.V.; "heaven of heavens" = "the highest heaven."  Cp 2 Cor 12:2, where "the third heaven" probably means the same thing.
36 Ps. 115:16.
No phrase could possibly be wider in its application, or more completely destructive of the claims of a landlord class to the monopoly of God's earth, than the simple words "children of men." Is there any man, woman or child who lives now, or who ever has lived, or who ever will live, who is not included among "the children of men?" No: Jew or Greek, native or foreigner, black or white, lord or peasant, rich or poor37 — all find, in this sweeping generalisation, the charter of their birthright in the soil. The simple and unlettered field-worker, who never heard of Herbert Spencer, may yet deduce from his Bible as good an argument for the "equal right to the use of the earth" as is to be found in Social Statics; and he will probably hold to it more tenaciously than the "Perplexed Philosopher" did. 37 ["This is the book of the generations of Adam," says the Bible; and the Rabbis comment: "Not rich, nor poor, nor learned, nor unlearned, nor great, no small, nor black, nor white, but MAN."  Again, we are told: "In the day that God created man," and the Hebr. sages explain: "God fashioned Adam alone, from whom sprang the entire human race. Thus no man can say, 'I am of a better or earlier stock.'"  "And these are the ordinances by which man shall live," enjoins the Bible; and the Talmud asserts, "Not the king or prince, not the priest or Levite, but MAN.  All alike were formed in the image of God." -- S.]
"For thus saith the Lord that created the heavens; God Himself that formed the earth and made it; He hath established it, He created it not in vain, He formed it to be inhabited: I am the Lord; and there is none else."38 So, in the Jewish tradition of the beginnings of the human race, as in other early traditions, the story begins with a man and a woman in a garden;39 with Land and Labor. It is the will of God that man should satisfy his bodily needs by the exercise of his labor upon the material which He has so abundantly provided. "It is good and comely for one to eat and to drink, and to enjoy the good of all his labor that he taketh under the sun all the days of his life, which God giveth him; for it is his portion"; "it is the gift of God."40 For man is so made, that he has nothing but the land to live from, nothing but labor — his own or some one else's — to live by.

38 Isa. 45:18; cp 2 Esd. 6:55, 59.

39 Gen 2:8, 9, 15 "garden" (in LXX "paradise") is rather "park."   The corresponding Hebrew word is translated in Neh 2:8 [R.V.m] and Eccles 2:5 [R.V.]

40 Eccles. 3:13, 5:18.

"So God created man in His own image, … male and female created He them. And God blesses them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. … Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree; ... to you it shall be for meat. … And God saw everything that He had made, and, behold, it was very good."41 41 Gen 1:27-31; cp. 9:1-3; Ps. 8:6-8.
But Adam was not the owner of the Garden of Eden; he only had the use of it, upon conditions. When those conditions were violated, "the Lord God sent him forth from the Garden of Eden, to till the ground whence he was taken," and to till it sorrowfully and in the sweat of his face.42 42 Gen 3:17-19, 23.  Cp. Verg. Georg 1:118-46
§ 4. If, therefore, God, the sole Landowner, has given the land to "the children of men" — i.e. to the whole human race in its widest extension through time and space — it follows that no single generation, still less any single individual, has absolute ownership in land. It is not the right of property in land, but the right to use land — limited by the equal right of every one else, now and for ever, to use land — that God has given to man. No man can claim land as "his very own," "to do as he likes with," e.g. to sell. "The land shall not be sold for ever; for the land is mine; for ye are strangers and sojourners with Me,"43 saith the Lord. No man could sell land "for ever"44 for any man's interest in it was only a life-interest; a temporary usufruct, and not a permanent, absolute ownership. It is only the interest of the race that is perpetual. "The days of the life of man may be numbered; but the days of Israel are innumerable."45 For God has given the land — i.e., the use of it — not to any particular class or generation of men, but to all generations of mankind. 43 Lev. 25:23
44 R.V. gives "the land shall not be sold in perpetuity;" Vulg., "in perpetuum;" Hebr., "to extinction" (so Oehler, Theology of the O.T., i. 348), "out and out."   Maimonides (Tractatus de juribus Anni Septimi 3t Jubilaei; Maius' Lat. trans., 1708) translates: "Terram non vendito absolute." According to Hebr. tradition, Abraham bouht land "out and out," from the Hittites, for a family burying-place.  The detailed account of this transaction (Gen. 23) is interesting; note especially the lawyer-like precision with which the subject of the purchase is specified (verses 17, 18) (49:29-32).  Jacob also bought land for a sanctuary (33:19, 20; Josh 24:32). 
45 Ecclus.37:25

§ 5. Lastly, "the profit of the earth is for all; the king himself is served by the field."46
46 Eccles. 5:9.  So translated in both the current English versions.  But the R.V.m. gives as alternative readings: "But the profit of a land every way is a king that maketh himself servant to the field" (i.e., promotes the cultivation of the land; or "is a king over the cultivated field."  "A sort of ancient claim that 'back to the land' is the only solution of the social problem") Prof. G. Currie Martin).
If these be, as I believe they are, the leading principles of the ancient teaching of "Moses and the Prophets" on the Land Question, the most surprising thing about them is, perhaps, their modernity. The mode of their expression is of course, always colored by the Theocratic perceptions of the Hebrew Commonwealth. But when our own great legal and constitutional authorities tell us
  • that "all landlords are merely tenants in the eyes of the law;"47
  • that "the idea of absolute ownership … is quite unknown to the English law; no man is in law the absolute owner of lands, he can only hold an estate in them";48
  • that "the king, therefore, hath only absolutum et directum dominium. … A subject hath only the usufruct, not the absolute property of the soil";49
they are only expressing in different language the same ideas as are embodied in the passages of Scripture above quoted. The theory of the old English law, which vested the ownership of the land in the Crown, as the visible embodiment of the claim of the whole Nation, generation after generation, to "the land which the Lord their God hath given them," resulted in exactly the same negation of private and individual ownership of land as followed upon the Hebrew formula, "The earth is the Lord's; the earth hath He given to the children of men." For, as the last of the Theocratic Republicans told the Israelites, "The Lord your God was your King."50 The highest interest in land which a Hebrew could hold was a tenancy in capite from the Lord Jehovah, the unseen King of Israel. There was no rent to pay, unless the small offering of firstfruits — a basket of "the first of the first-fruits of all the fruit of the earth"51 — be regarded as a sort of quit-rent, — a formal acknowledgement of Jehovah's absolutum et directum dominium. The Deuteronomic edition of the Law does, in fact, prescribe a ritual for the offering of the first-fruits, in which this view is clearly and beautifully implied.52  

47 Joshua Williams, On Real Property, Chapter 1.

48 ibid.

49 Blackstone

50 1 Samuel 12:12

51 Ex 22:29, 23:19, 24: 22, 26; Lev. 23:17; Num 15: 19-21;  Deut 18:4; 2 Kings 4:42; Neh. 10:35, 37.

52 Deut. 26:1-11.

So when Henry George, in drafting the first manifesto of the first National Society for the propagation of his teachings, wrote53 that "no number of individuals can justly grant away the equal rights of other individuals to land, and no generation can grant away the rights of future generations," he was merely re-echoing, as he would have been the first to admit, some of the most primitive doctrines on the Land Question. For, in the youth of the world, when the relation of man to the earth on which he lived was still simple and natural, was easier than it is now for men to see the truth about the Land Question steadily, and to see it whole. 53 Manifesto of the English Land Restoration League (now the English League for the Taxation of Land Values), 1884.  The League was founded in March, 1883.
Again, when the modern Land Reformer draws from his general principles the practical deduction that the value of land should meet the cost of the public expenses, he is only restating, in terms of modern conditions, the truth that "the profit of the earth is for all; the king himself is served by the field."






 

To share this page with a friend: right click, choose "send," and add your comments; or select "File, Send."

Related
WealthandWant
themes
:
:

The earth is the Lord's
Red links have not been visited; .
Green links are pages you've seen
Home
Top of page
Themes index
Documents index
to email this page to a friend: right click, choose "send"
   
What Would Jesus Tax?
www.whatwouldjesustax.com
   
How do we organize and tax ourselves so as to live in justice, peace with our neighbors, and widely-shared prosperity?
The wisdom of the ages for 21st century questions.